Why Rahul Gandhi faces immediate disqualification?

-

New Delhi: Leader of India’s Congress party, Rahul Gandhi, was held guilty and sentenced to two years in jail in a 2019 criminal defamation case for his remarks over the ‘Modi surname’. As per the Indian Supreme Court, two-year imprisonment technically attracts his disqualification from the Indian parliament.

As per the apex court’s rule, lawmakers including MPs, automatically lose their membership if convicted for a minimum of two years.

The Congress scion, however, retains his membership of the Indian parliament as the court in Gujarat’s Surat that convicted him has suspended his sentence for 30 days. This saves him from immediate disqualification and also gives him option to move a higher court to challenge the verdict.

Why Rahul Gandhi faces immediate disqualification?

As per the Indian Supreme Court’s landmark Lily Thomas vs Union of India judgement of 10 July, 2013, Rahul faces “immediate disqualification”.

In its judgement in the case, the apex court ruled that any member of parliament (MP), member of legislative assembly (MLA) and member of legislative council (MLC) convicted of a crime and sentenced to a minimum of 2 years in jail, loses membership of the parliament/state assembly with immediate effect.

However, in 2013, the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government tried to overturn the top court’s judgement and retain Section 8(4) of Representation of the People Act, which allowed elected representatives three months to appeal their conviction.

The court, however, struck it down, terming it as “unconstitutional”.

It must be recalled that a political leader from the north Indian state of Uttar Pradesh’s Samajwadi Party (SP), Abdullah Azam Khan, was immediately disqualified from the state assembly after a trial court convicted him to 2 years in prison in criminal case.

When conviction results to disqualification of Indian lawmakers?

The disqualification of a lawmaker convicted for an offence can happen in two instances. They are:

1 – The offence for which he/she is convicted is listed in Section 8(1) of the Representation of the People Act of 1951 which includes certain specific offences like promoting enmity between two groups, bribery and undue influence or personation at an election. The list does not include defamation.

2- If he/she is convicted for any other offence but is sentenced for a period of two years or more. Section 8(3) of the Representation of the People Act of 1951 mandates that a lawmaker can be disqualified if convicted and sentenced to not less than two years of imprisonment.

2019 Modi surname defamation case against Rahul Gandhi

On Thursday, the Surat court held Rahul guilty of criminal defamation for his remark about the Modi surname ahead of the 2019 national polls. He has been convicted under the Indian Penal Code’s (IPC) Section 500, which provides for imprisonment of up to two years, and later released on bail.

The court which held Rahul guilty also granted him bail and suspended the sentence for 30 days.

Who filed the defamation case against Rahul Gandhi?

The defamation case against Rahul Gandhi was filed by former chief minister of Gujarat Purnesh Modi for allegedly defaming the Modi community at a rally in 2019 at Kolar city in southern Indian state of Karnataka.

What did Rahul Gandhi say?

Addressing a political rally in Kolar in the run-up to 2019 Lok Sabha elections, Rahul allegedly said: “How come all the thieves have Modi as the common surname?”

Read all the Latest News, Trending News, Cricket News, Bollywood News,
India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.



from Firstpost India Latest News https://ift.tt/C712jZW
Umang Sharma

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Both COVID-19 vaccine doses needed for good protection against B16172 variant

-
It’s been a concerning few weeks in the UK, with the B16172 variant first taking hold and then spreading to become dominant. This more infectious form of the virus, initially identified in India, is what we’re now going to have to live with – unless it is out-competed by another variant in the future. Worryingly, experts had predicted that B16172 might be able to escape some of the effects of vaccines, which if true would threaten to derail the UK’s plans to finish lifting restrictions from the end of June. However, Public Health England (PHE) has looked at the ability of various variants to evade immunity and says that the UK’s vaccines remain effective against the variants circulating, including B16172. On the surface, this looks like good news. But delve a bit deeper, and things get more complicated, says Paul Hunter, professor of medicine at the University of East Anglia. PHE’s research found a little drop-off in protection against B16172 among people who were fully vaccinated.
Read more

New coronavirus variant emerge in India: How should our COVID response change?

-
Image
After genome sequencing of over 10,000 COVID-19 cases in India, researchers have discovered a new variant with two new mutations which may be better at evading the immune system. In 15-20 percent of samples from the Indian state of Maharashtra (the state accounting for 62 percent of cases in the country) a new, double mutation in key areas of the virus has been detected. These are now known as the E484Q and L452R mutations. What makes the variant different? Both these mutations are concerning because they are located in a key portion of the virus – the spike protein – that it uses to penetrate human cells. Spike proteins attach via a “receptor binding domain”, meaning the virus can attach to receptors in our cells. These new mutations include changes to the spike protein that make it a “better fit” for human cells. This means the virus can gain entry more easily and multiply faster. Given what we have seen with other similar mutations , it might also make it harder for our immu
Read more

120 flights delayed, 30 trains running late; Delhi fog & cold wave continue to give shiver to travellers

-
Arrival and departure of 120 flights, both domestic and international, to Delhi airport were affected due to dense fog and cold wave conditions on Wednesday, according to Delhi Airport FIDS (Flight Information Display System). As per the Delhi Airport FIDS, a total of 53 flights, including 21 domestic arrivals, 16 domestic departures, 13 international departures and three international arrivals scheduled are cancelled and not operating due to fog and other operational reasons from and to Indira Gandhi International (IGI) Airport in the national capital on 17 January. #WATCH | Delhi: Several flight operations delayed at IGI airport due to low visibility amid fog. pic.twitter.com/hG1DUKllEt — ANI (@ANI) January 17, 2024 Visuals from the Delhi airport showed passengers waiting outside, checking update of their scheduled flights. There were also some people waiting for flight of their families, friends and loved ones to arrive, which got delayed due to fog. #WATCH | Delhi | Pas
Read more