Why Hindus should not be obsessed with UCC and Section 295A, and instead seek liberation of temples
I have been a free speech absolutist. I detested Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) the same way hard-core Nehruvians abhorred Article 44 of the Constitution. Section 295A defines and prescribes punishment for “deliberate and malicious” acts, intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs. As for Article 44, it lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) for the citizens throughout the territory of India. However, in the wake of the Nupur Sharma episode, and especially after the killing of at least six people just for supporting the former BJP spokesperson, the fallacy of the idea of free speech was too evident to miss. Though such incidents have occurred several times in the past too, the fact that this time it has taken place when there is a strong, nationalist government at the Centre, has been an eye-opener on the challenges facing the nation. Free speech absolutism requires absolute an