Centre files review petition against Rajiv Gandhi convicts’ release: What does this mean for Nalini Sriharan and others?

-

On 11 November, the Supreme Court, in a surprise move, ordered the premature release of the remaining convicts serving life imprisonment in connection with the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. After the court’s order, Nalini Sriharan, R P Ravichandran, Santhan, Murugan, Robert Payas and Jayakumar walked out of jail amid much anger from the Congress party.

Almost a week later, the matter has taken a turn with the Centre now seeking a review of the Supreme Court’s order for the premature release of the six convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.

The central government said the order granting remission to the convicts, who had assassinated the former prime minister, was passed without affording it adequate opportunity for hearing despite it being a necessary party to the case. The government said the convicts did not formally implead the Centre as a party which resulted in its non-participation in the case.

“Thus absence of any assistance by the Union of India, due to procedural lapse of convicts/petitioners, while the present matter was being finally heard and decided has prevented this Court from appreciating the crucial and important evidence in the matter, which if presented, would have assisted this court to arrive at a just and correct judgment in the matter,” said the Centre, as per a PTI report.

What does this mean for Nalini Sriharan and the other convicts, who were let out of prison? What exactly does a review petition mean? Will this mean they will have to stand for trial again?

We sift through all the legalese and give you the answers.

What’s a review petition?

When the Supreme Court passes down a judgment, it becomes the law of the land — it’s final. However, a review petition is a petition in which it is prayed before the Court of law to review its order or judgment which it has already pronounced.

Under Article 137 of the Constitution of India and the rules made under Article 145, the Supreme Court of India has the power to review its judgment pronounced by it.

As per Supreme Court rules, a review petition is to be filed within 30 days of the pronouncement of judgment or order and that petition should be circulated without oral arguments to the same bench that delivered the judgment.

Who can file a review petition?

As per the rules, it is not necessary that only parties to a case can seek a review of the judgment on it. As per the Civil Procedure Code and the Supreme Court Rules, any person aggrieved by the judgment can seek a review.

In the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, the Centre has sought a review petition, stating that the apex court should have heard the Union of India before passing an order to release the convicts. “Petitions/applications related to the case were filed in the court without making the Union of India a party,” the petition stated.

In its petition, the Centre further said, “In such a sensitive matter, the assistance of Union of India was of paramount importance as the matter has huge repercussions on the public order, peace, tranquillity and criminal justice system of the country.”

Will the court hear the entire case again?

No. A review petition is entertained only under specific, narrow grounds and only to correct a “patent error”.

As Justice Krishna Iyer in a 1975 ruling said that a review can be accepted “only where a glaring omission or patent mistake or like grave error has crept in earlier by judicial fallibility”.

As per the rules, the court only accepts a review on three grounds:
• the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which, after the exercise of due diligence, was not within the knowledge of the petitioner or could not be produced by him;
• mistake or error apparent on the face of the record;
• any sufficient reason that is analogous to the other two grounds.

In seeking a review of the Rajiv case judgment, the government has highlighted an alleged procedural lapse, saying the convicts seeking remission did not formally implead the Centre as a party which resulted in its non-participation in the case.

How often does the Court review its decision?

It is not often that the Supreme Court accepts a review and overturns an original decision in a review. However, it does in some cases.

In 2019, the Supreme Court in a 3-2 verdict agreed to review its 2018 verdict in the Sabarimala case.

The apex court, however, refused to review its December 2018 ruling seeking a probe into the Rafale deal.

The court has allowed the Centre’s petition seeking a review of a March 2018 judgment that had effectively diluted the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Atrocities Act.

What does this mean for Nalini Sriharan and the others?

As of now, nothing. While the Centre has filed a plea for a review petition, the Court hasn’t accepted it.

For the time being, she and the others are free.

With inputs from agencies

Read all the Latest News, Trending News, Cricket News, Bollywood News,
India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.



from Firstpost India Latest News https://ift.tt/D6Kxne4
FP Explainers

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Both COVID-19 vaccine doses needed for good protection against B16172 variant

-
It’s been a concerning few weeks in the UK, with the B16172 variant first taking hold and then spreading to become dominant. This more infectious form of the virus, initially identified in India, is what we’re now going to have to live with – unless it is out-competed by another variant in the future. Worryingly, experts had predicted that B16172 might be able to escape some of the effects of vaccines, which if true would threaten to derail the UK’s plans to finish lifting restrictions from the end of June. However, Public Health England (PHE) has looked at the ability of various variants to evade immunity and says that the UK’s vaccines remain effective against the variants circulating, including B16172. On the surface, this looks like good news. But delve a bit deeper, and things get more complicated, says Paul Hunter, professor of medicine at the University of East Anglia. PHE’s research found a little drop-off in protection against B16172 among people who were fully vaccinated.
Read more

New coronavirus variant emerge in India: How should our COVID response change?

-
Image
After genome sequencing of over 10,000 COVID-19 cases in India, researchers have discovered a new variant with two new mutations which may be better at evading the immune system. In 15-20 percent of samples from the Indian state of Maharashtra (the state accounting for 62 percent of cases in the country) a new, double mutation in key areas of the virus has been detected. These are now known as the E484Q and L452R mutations. What makes the variant different? Both these mutations are concerning because they are located in a key portion of the virus – the spike protein – that it uses to penetrate human cells. Spike proteins attach via a “receptor binding domain”, meaning the virus can attach to receptors in our cells. These new mutations include changes to the spike protein that make it a “better fit” for human cells. This means the virus can gain entry more easily and multiply faster. Given what we have seen with other similar mutations , it might also make it harder for our immu
Read more

Aditya L1 Mission: Spacecraft is nearing its final phase, says ISRO chief

-
Aditya L1 spacecraft is nearing its final phase, and manoeuvres to enter the L1 point are expected to be completed by January 7, 2024, according to ISRO Chairman S Somanath. “Aditya is on the way. I think it has reached almost its final phase,” the ISRO chief told PTI on the sidelines of an event organised at VSSC to commemorate the 60th year of the First Sounding Rocket Launch. Aditya L1, India’s first space-based mission to study the Sun, was successfully launched on September 2 from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre (SDSC) in Sriharikota. The spacecraft, after travelling about 1.5 million km from Earth over 125 days, is expected to be placed in a Halo orbit around the Lagrangian point L1, considered closest to the Sun. He said that the last preparations for the spacecraft’s entry into the L1 point are currently underway incrementally.”Possibly by January 7th, the final manoeuvres will be done for entering into the L1 point,” Somanath added. Among other tasks, it will capture and tr
Read more