Farmers' protest enters Day 10: A look at State amendments to Centre's laws and how they address producers' concerns

-

More than a month ago, in response to the initial protests by farmers against the new Central farm laws, three state assemblies — Chhattisgarh, Punjab, and Rajasthan — had passed Bills to address farmers’ concerns. While these Bills await the state Governors’ assent, protests against the Central farm laws have again gained momentum. In this post, we discuss the key amendments proposed by these states in response to the central farm laws.

Agricultural marketing in most states is regulated by the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committees (APMCs), set up under the state APMC Acts. The Central farm laws seek to facilitate multiple channels of marketing outside the existing APMC markets.

Many of these existing markets face issues such as a limited number of buyers restricting the entry of new players and undue deductions in the form of commission charges and market fees.

The Central laws introduced a liberalised agricultural marketing system with the aim of increasing the availability of buyers for farmers’ produce. It is expected that more buyers would lead to competition in the agri market, thus resulting in better prices for farmers.

The Central farm laws allow anyone with a PAN card to buy farmers’ produce in the ‘trade area’ outside the markets notified or run by the APMCs. Buyers do not need to get a license from the state government or APMC, or pay any tax to them for such purchase in the ‘trade area’.

These changes in regulations raised concerns regarding the kind of protection available to farmers in the ‘trade area’ outside APMC markets, particularly in terms of price discovery and payment. To address such concerns, the states of Chhattisgarh, Punjab, and Rajasthan, in varying forms, proposed amendments to the existing agricultural marketing laws.

Chhattisgarh passed a Bill to amend its APMC Act to allow the state government to notify structures outside APMC markets, such as godowns, cold storages, and e-trading platforms, as deemed markets. The central farm laws consider deemed markets under the states’ jurisdiction and thus, under the control of the APMCs. APMCs therefore can levy market fees on the sale of farmers’ produce in such deemed markets and require the buyer to have a licence.

Punjab and Rajasthan passed Bills to amend the Central farm Acts, especially the application of the three acts in the respective states. These state amendment Bills provide that they will override any other law currently in force and respective state APMC laws will continue to apply in these states. Some of the other key changes made by these state amendment Bills to the central Acts are:

Market fee: The Central Acts prohibit the state governments and APMCs from levying any market fee, cess, or any other charge on the trade of farmers’ produce outside the APMC markets. The Punjab and Rajasthan Bills empower the state governments to levy a fee on private traders and electronic trading platforms for trade outside the state APMC markets. Such fees collected will be utilised for the welfare of small and marginal farmers in Punjab and for running the APMCs and welfare of farmers in Rajasthan.

Minimum Support Price (MSP): The Central Acts provide a framework for a farming agreement prior to the production or rearing of any farm produce. This allows farmers to enter into an agreement with buyers before sowing, to sell the produce at a minimum pre-determined price. The state Bills provide that the predetermined prices for a crop under farming agreements should be at prices equal to or above the MSP (only for wheat and paddy in the case of Punjab). The Punjab Bill mandates MSP for any sale or purchase of wheat and paddy, even if it is not under any farming agreement.

The state Bills prescribe penalties if a buyer compels a farmer to sell farm produce at a price below MSP. In Punjab, such an offence will be penalised with imprisonment of at least three years and a fine. In Rajasthan, compelling farmers to sell below MSP and refusing to accept produce (under an agreement), within a week of intimation by the farmer, will attract imprisonment between three to seven years, or a fine of at least five lakh rupees, or both.

Imposition of stock limit: The Central Acts prohibit the imposition of stock limits on farming produce under a farming agreement. The Rajasthan Bill empowers the state government to impose stock limits, under certain conditions, on any farm produce under a farming agreement. These conditions are: (i) if there is a shortage of such farm produce in the state, or, (ii) if there is a 25 percent increase in prices of such produce beyond the maximum price which was prevailing in the market.

Essential commodities: The Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 2020, empowers the Central Government to regulate the supply of certain food items, including cereals, pulses, potato, and onions, only under extraordinary circumstances such as war, famine, extraordinary price rise, and natural calamity of grave nature. The state amendment Bills provide that the respective state governments will also have these powers under certain extraordinary circumstances such as famine, price rise, natural calamity, or any other situations.

Dispute Resolution Mechanism: The central Acts prohibit civil courts from adjudicating over disputes under the Acts. They provide that disputes between farmers and traders will be resolved through a Conciliation Board set up by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM). If the dispute remains unresolved, the SDM may be approached for resolution.

The Punjab Bill allows farmers to approach civil courts or avail other remedies under existing laws, in addition to the ones available under the Central Acts.

The Rajasthan Bill provides that the jurisdiction of civil courts over disputes will be as per the state APMC Act and rules under it.

The amendments proposed by states aim to address the concerns of farmers, but to a varying extent. The Bills have not come into force yet as they await the respective Governors’ assent. In addition, the Punjab and Rajasthan Bills also need the assent of the President as they seek to amend laws passed by the Parliament.

Meanwhile, amidst the ongoing protests, many farmers’ organisations are in talks with the Central Government to seek redressal of their grievances and appropriate changes in the central farm laws. It remains to be seen to what extent will such changes address the concerns of farmers.

The authors are analysts in the research team at PRS Legislative Research



from Firstpost India Latest News https://ift.tt/3mL7VR2
Suyash Tiwari and Prachi Kaur

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Both COVID-19 vaccine doses needed for good protection against B16172 variant

-
It’s been a concerning few weeks in the UK, with the B16172 variant first taking hold and then spreading to become dominant. This more infectious form of the virus, initially identified in India, is what we’re now going to have to live with – unless it is out-competed by another variant in the future. Worryingly, experts had predicted that B16172 might be able to escape some of the effects of vaccines, which if true would threaten to derail the UK’s plans to finish lifting restrictions from the end of June. However, Public Health England (PHE) has looked at the ability of various variants to evade immunity and says that the UK’s vaccines remain effective against the variants circulating, including B16172. On the surface, this looks like good news. But delve a bit deeper, and things get more complicated, says Paul Hunter, professor of medicine at the University of East Anglia. PHE’s research found a little drop-off in protection against B16172 among people who were fully vaccinated.
Read more

New coronavirus variant emerge in India: How should our COVID response change?

-
Image
After genome sequencing of over 10,000 COVID-19 cases in India, researchers have discovered a new variant with two new mutations which may be better at evading the immune system. In 15-20 percent of samples from the Indian state of Maharashtra (the state accounting for 62 percent of cases in the country) a new, double mutation in key areas of the virus has been detected. These are now known as the E484Q and L452R mutations. What makes the variant different? Both these mutations are concerning because they are located in a key portion of the virus – the spike protein – that it uses to penetrate human cells. Spike proteins attach via a “receptor binding domain”, meaning the virus can attach to receptors in our cells. These new mutations include changes to the spike protein that make it a “better fit” for human cells. This means the virus can gain entry more easily and multiply faster. Given what we have seen with other similar mutations , it might also make it harder for our immu
Read more

Aditya L1 Mission: Spacecraft is nearing its final phase, says ISRO chief

-
Aditya L1 spacecraft is nearing its final phase, and manoeuvres to enter the L1 point are expected to be completed by January 7, 2024, according to ISRO Chairman S Somanath. “Aditya is on the way. I think it has reached almost its final phase,” the ISRO chief told PTI on the sidelines of an event organised at VSSC to commemorate the 60th year of the First Sounding Rocket Launch. Aditya L1, India’s first space-based mission to study the Sun, was successfully launched on September 2 from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre (SDSC) in Sriharikota. The spacecraft, after travelling about 1.5 million km from Earth over 125 days, is expected to be placed in a Halo orbit around the Lagrangian point L1, considered closest to the Sun. He said that the last preparations for the spacecraft’s entry into the L1 point are currently underway incrementally.”Possibly by January 7th, the final manoeuvres will be done for entering into the L1 point,” Somanath added. Among other tasks, it will capture and tr
Read more